Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ROAM/EORTC-1308 is an international (Europe and Australasia) phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing radiotherapy (60Gy/30#) to observation after surgery for atypical meningioma. The treatment plans of all the patients randomised to radiotherapy were reviewed and approved prior to treatment delivery, either by the UK RTTQA group (European sites) or the Australian TROG (Australia and New Zealand). Pretrial credentialling included outlining and planning a benchmark case (DR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Variations from the guidelines were noted in quality assurance (QA) reports both for DR and for the on-trial Individual Case Reviews (ICRs) and classed as major or minor. After recruitment had finished, a random 10% of the ICRs were independently reviewed for audit purposes. We used the QA reports to analyse the variations in the DR and in the ICRs RESULTS: 56 sites (20 UK, 25 EORTC, 11 TROG) undertook the DR of which 13 (23%) had major variations. During the trial 64 patients at 28 sites received radiotherapy, the median being 2 patients per site. Overall, 25 (39%) patient cases needed resubmitting: 22 (36%) sets of outlines (2 cases twice) and 12 (14%) treatment plans (1 plan twice). CONCLUSIONS: For complex radiotherapy of rare tumours, a DR is insufficient and prospective ICRs of all patients is required. The consistent high-quality radiotherapy in ROAM/EORTC1308 ensures the primary outcome (progression free survival) will be a robust assessment and any difference between treatment arms cannot be attributed to variation in radiotherapy treatment.

Background: Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, but dose selection remains largely uniform despite substantial interpatient variability in tumor radiosensitivity. This limitation is particularly consequential in children, in whom radiation-associated toxicity has lifelong impact. The genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD), which integrates tumor genomics with delivered radiation dose, quantifies the biological effect of radiotherapy and has been validated across multiple adult malignancies. Its relevance in pediatric CNS tumors remains unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using gene expression and clinical data from 246 pediatric patients with high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, or ependymoma from the Childrens Brain Tumor Network. GARD was calculated using a sequencing-adapted radiosensitivity index integrated with radiation dose via the linear-quadratic model. Associations between GARD, physical radiation dose, and clinical outcomes (event-free survival and overall survival) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by tumor type and anatomic location. Patients who did not receive radiotherapy were analyzed as a negative control cohort (sham-GARD). Results: Among patients receiving radiotherapy, physical radiation dose was relatively uniform, yet GARD demonstrated substantial interpatient variability in predicted biological effect. Higher GARD was significantly associated with improved event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97; p=0.004) and overall survival (HR 0.90, 0.83-0.99; p=0.018). By contrast, physical radiation dose was not associated with either endpoint. In patients who did not receive radiotherapy, sham-GARD was not associated with outcomes, supporting its role as a treatment-specific predictor rather than a general prognostic biomarker. Conclusions: In pediatric CNS tumors, the biological effect of radiotherapy as quantified by GARD is associated with clinical outcomes, whereas physical dose alone is not. These findings challenge the current paradigm of uniform radiotherapy dosing and support a genomically informed approach to dose individualization. Prospective evaluation of GARD-guided radiotherapy is warranted to optimize tumor control while minimizing long-term toxicity in children.

Background. Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) increasingly varies in radiotherapy use, sequence, and intensity. Pretreatment biomarkers for the mismatch-repair-proficient majority remain limited: the biopsy-adapted Immunoscore predicts neoadjuvant response and recurrence risk, but no available biomarker estimates intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity or guides radiotherapy dose, use, or sequence. Genomic Adjusted Radiation Dose (GARD) combines the biopsy-derived Radiosensitivity Index (RSI) with the prescribed dose-fractionation schedule through the linear-quadratic model to estimate tumor-specific modeled radiation effect. We sought to evaluate whether pretreatment GARD is prognostic for outcomes in radiotherapy-treated LARC. Patients and methods. We performed a retrospective pooled analysis of 497 patients with LARC drawn from four prospective clinical trial and institutional cohorts; 335 patients (67%) were prospectively enrolled in clinical trials. The cohort spanned induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (n=142), CRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (n=120), and CRT without sequential chemotherapy (n=235). Pretreatment gene expression was measured by microarray or RNA sequencing and harmonized across platforms before GARD calculation. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). GARD was evaluated continuously using cohort-stratified Cox regression and dichotomized at the outcome-blind pooled-cohort median of 19.3. Multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, and clinical stage. Results. Median follow-up was 5.3 years. Among 456 patients evaluable for DFS, 99 experienced an event. Higher GARD was associated with longer DFS as a continuous variable (hazard ratio [HR] per 1-unit increase, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99; p=0.027) and at the median threshold (GARD >19.3 versus <19.3: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.92; p=0.021). Five-year DFS was 81% versus 73%, and 10-year DFS was 80% versus 66%, respectively. GARD remained independently associated with DFS after adjustment for age, sex, and clinical stage (HR, 0.92; p=0.023). Overall survival (OS) was directionally consistent but not statistically significant (HR per 1-unit increase, 0.94; p=0.18). Among 445 patients with evaluable Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) scores, higher-GARD patients had lower median NAR scores (8.4 versus 15.0; p=0.004), were more frequently classified as low risk (34% versus 21%), and were less frequently classified as high risk (23% versus 31%). Among 460 patients evaluable for pathologic complete response (pCR), the pCR rate was numerically higher with higher GARD (22% versus 15%; odds ratio per 1-unit increase, 1.07; p=0.09). Conclusions. Pretreatment GARD, a biology-based model of tumor-specific radiation effect, stratified DFS independently of clinical stage and was associated with NAR-defined pathologic response across contemporary treatment sequences. These findings provide multicohort evidence of prognostic validity but do not establish prediction of radiotherapy benefit. Prospective GARD-stratified trials should test whether incorporating tumor radiosensitivity into decisions about radiotherapy use, dose, and sequence improves tumor control and organ preservation while reducing treatment-related morbidity.

The purpose of this work is to analyze the 2-year overall survival (OS2y) of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), aiming at characterizing the response of LS-SCLC, and in particular the /{beta} value and proliferation parameters. Through a systematic analysis of the literature, we collated a dataset containing 57 entries (3363 patients) of response of LS-SCLC treated with CRT. Radiotherapy schedules ranged from hyper- to hypofractionation. Four radiobiological models to describe the OS2y were investigated, with progressive levels of complexity including the effect of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, treatment year and toxicity. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to compare models, and the profile likelihood methodology to compute confidence intervals. Model 4, which includes the effect of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, treatment year and dose-dependent toxicity, provided the best fits of the experimental data (lowest AIC value). While being the best model, model 4 still fails to provide a good prediction of the OS2y, in particular failing to predict the survival of the schedules achieving the lower/higher survivals. The radiobiological analysis of the dose-response of LS-SCLC to CRT does not allow to narrowly constrain the value of response parameters. We attribute this limitation to the large heterogeneity of this disease. Nonetheless, our analysis shows a large /{beta} value (>9 Gy, 95% CI), which implies a low fractionation effect in the radiotherapy of LS-SCLC. and an accelerated proliferation of tumor cells, {lambda}' > 1.6 Gy/day (95% CI), after a kick-off time of ~4-5 weeks, which supports the use of accelerated protocols to avoid the effect of tumor proliferation on the clinical outcome.

Purpose/Objective: Genitourinary (GU) adverse events (AEs) are common during and after pelvic radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer and can substantially impact quality of life. We convened an international committee to establish consensus in the prevention, mitigation, and management of radiation-related acute and late GU AEs, as there are no relevant evidence-based consensus guidelines to inform treating providers. Materials/Methods: A systematic evidence review focused on mitigation and management of radiation-related acute and late GU AEs was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. The following topics were addressed: management of acute GU AEs in the intact and post-operative settings; RT techniques; bladder outlet obstruction procedures; and indications for urology referral or hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO). Evidence-based consensus recommendations were developed using a Delphi process. We highlight the current state of evidence and evidence gaps worthy of future study. Results: Consensus was reached for 31 key questions. For management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), most evidence comes from trials in patients without cancer and not undergoing RT. A consensus algorithm for medical management of acute GU AEs was developed with the following highlights: (a) alpha blockers as 1st-line for obstructive symptoms in the intact setting, (b) anti-spasmodics as 1st -line for irritative symptoms in the intact setting, and (c) anti-spasmodics as 1st -line in the post-operative setting. The consensus algorithm provides an ordered list of medications to offer if 1st -line options afford inadequate relief. For RT fractionation, randomized clinical trial (RCT) data are available. 40% of panelists rarely or never use standard fractionation over moderate hypofractionation for patients with baseline LUTS, but most consider moderate hypofractionation over SBRT for AUA IPSS > 15. For patients with severe obstructive LUTS (most commonly AUA IPSS >20), the panel recommends a prophylactic bladder outlet obstruction procedure and, if obstructive symptoms improve, consideration of moderate hypofractionation or SBRT, based on retrospective data. There is one RCT supporting use of HBO for late radiation cystitis. Conclusions: The consensus guideline synthesizes available evidence and expert opinion across key clinical decision points to provide practical guidance in the prevention, mitigation, and management of radiation-related acute and late GU AEs in prostate cancer RT. Envisioned as a living document with periodic updates, this guideline serves as a resource for practicing radiation oncologists by outlining expert-derived consensus recommendations of evidence-based care in areas where high-quality data is limited.

Background: Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) is a widely used respiratory motion management technique for minimizing cardiac dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy. In the Breast HYPORT Adjuvant study, DIBH was employed for cardiac sparing in patients without nodal irradiation using a standardized institutional protocol with the Varian Real-time Position Management (RPM) system. Both moderate-hypofractionation (control arm - 40Gy in 15 fractions) and one-week hypofractionation (experimental arm - 26 Gy in 5 fractions) regimens were delivered using this protocol. This study aimed to evaluate the robustness of DIBH by analyzing intra-fraction stability and inter-fraction reproducibility of breath-hold amplitude across the two treatment regimens. Methods: Respiratory waveforms acquired during each treatment session were analyzed to determine the median breath-hold amplitude and its standard deviation during beam delivery. Intra-fraction stability was assessed from vari- ations within individual treatment sessions, while inter-fraction reproducibility was evaluated relative to the simula- tion waveform amplitude across all treatment sessions. These parameters were compared between the two HYPORT regimens to examine breath-hold consistency during treatment delivery. Moreover, an additional comparison was made between the one-week hypofractionation regimen and the first five fractions of the moderate-hypofractionation regimen to evaluate the effect of treatment duration . Lung volumes from free-breathing and DIBH CT scans were analyzed to assess the effectiveness of patient breath-hold training. Results: Both arms demonstrated an average 1.7-fold increase of air volume in lung during the breath-hold position, confirming the effective implementation of DIBH during treatment planning and delivery. Structured training resulted in increased breath-hold amplitudes, with gains of 22.87% and 24.16% with respect to the first trial session in the experimental and control arms, respectively. Both regimens receive equivalent doses for approximately the same air volume in lung . Despite the different prescription doses in the two arms (26 Gy vs. 40 Gy), the experimental arm achieved an equivalent mean heart dose of 2.91% (75.6 cGy) compared with 2.95% (118.51 cGy) in the control arm, suggesting a similar cardiac preservation protocol adopted during treatment planning. Intra-fraction stability was similar between the control arm and the experimental arm, with median amplitude variations of 1.006 mm (95% CI: [0.998-1.015]) and 1.079 mm (95% CI: [1.067-1.097]), respectively. In contrast, inter-fraction reproducibility improved in the experimental arm, with lower deviation from simulation amplitude (0.44 {+/-} 0.24 mm vs. 0.66 {+/-} 0.25 mm) for the entire treatment schedule. The stability and reproducibility of experimental arm were further compared with the first five fractions of the control arm. The results were similar to those of the experimental arm. Conclusion: In this study, we compared two treatment regimens in terms of intra-fraction stability and inter-fraction reproducibility during DIBH radiotherapy. Both regimens demonstrated comparable intra-fraction stability, indicating effective motion management irrespective of treatment duration. However, the experimental arm showed better inter- fraction reproducibility, suggesting more consistent breath-hold performance throughout the treatment course. Based on stability and reproducibility, a reasonable narrowing of the DIBH gating window may be implemented with minor changes to the institutional protocol. The observed trend highlights the potential for improved consistency with the experimental approach and supports further investigation to better understand the underlying factors and strengthen these findings in future studies.

Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains associated with poor outcomes, with most recurrences occurring within the high-dose radiation field, suggesting persistent radioresistance. Exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibition with Selinexor has demonstrated radiosensitizing effects in preclinical models. We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of Selinexor in combination with standard chemoradiation for newly diagnosed GBM. Methods: This investigator-initiated phase I dose-escalation trial (3+3 design) enrolled adults with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma. Patients received standard radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with concurrent temozolomide and escalating doses of Selinexor. Three dose levels were evaluated: 80 mg weekly (weeks 1, 2, 4, 5); 60 mg twice weekly (weeks 1, 2, 4, 5); and 60 mg twice weekly (weeks 1-6) throughout radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), patterns of failure, and patient-reported outcomes (MDASI-BT). Results: Eleven patients were enrolled. Median age was 58 years, and median KPS was 90. The MTD was established at Selinexor 60 mg twice weekly during weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 of chemoradiation. Dose level 3 exceeded the MTD with two DLTs. Treatment compliance was high, with minimal missed radiotherapy fractions. Median PFS was 15.9 months (95% CI, 6.2 28.5), and median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.1 not reached). Most recurrences were central (5/6 evaluable patients). Notably, multiple cases of delayed pseudoprogression were observed at 5, 9, 10, and 23 months post-radiotherapy. Patient-reported symptom burden remained stable over time. Conclusions: Selinexor can be safely combined with standard chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed GBM, with an MTD of 60 mg twice weekly during select treatment weeks. Preliminary efficacy signals and an increased incidence of delayed pseudoprogression suggest a potential radiosensitizing effect. These findings support further investigation of Selinexor in larger, prospective studies.

Introduction Trials investigating hypofractionated radiotherapy in carcinoma cervix have demonstrated an increased risk of acute gastrointestinal toxicity. Patients with node negative disease have a very low risk of pelvic nodal relapse, a dose painting approach integrating differential doses to the primary and elective nodal clinical target volumes may allow safe hypofractionated radiotherapy by reducing the acute gastro-intestinal toxicity. Methods and Analysis Patients with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) associated squamous cell carcinoma who have no pelvic nodal involvement as documented on PET CT and MRI will be eligible. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive standard whole pelvic radiotherapy (CRT) covering the primary clinical target volume (CTVp) and the nodal clinical target volume (CTVn) to a dose of 45 Gy (25 fractions, 1.8 Gy per fraction) with concurrent weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2 weekly for five cycles. In the experimental arm (HDRT), a dose of 42.5 Gy (2.125 Gy per fraction) and 36 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction) will be delivered in 20 fractions to the CTVp and CTVn respectively. Concurrent cisplatin will be delivered at a dose of 50 mg/m2 weekly for four cycles. The primary objective will be to compare the proportion of patients with grade 2 or higher acute gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea). Secondary outcomes will include disease free survival, quality of life and late toxicity. The primary statistical analysis will be reported on the intention-to-treat population. The primary outcome will be analysed using a covariate adjusted log binomial model to compare the relative risk of grade 2 or higher acute gastrointestinal toxicity. We assume that HDRT will reduce the toxicity rate from 35% to 21% (14% absolute risk reduction). Using an asymmetric two-sided group sequential design with three planned interim analyses, the target sample size is 274 patients for 80% power with a 5% (1-sided) type I error. Ethics and dissemination The trial will be initiated at the participating centers after institutional review board approval at the respective centers. All patients will provide written informed consent. The results will be presented in peer reviewed literature as well as academic conferences. Trial Registration The trial has been prospectively registered in the clinical trial registry of India.

Background: Cognitive impairment is a prevalent long-term sequela in glioma patients, yet its cerebrovascular correlates remain poorly characterized. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion MRI offers a non-invasive means to quantify cerebral blood flow (CBF) and may serve as a sensitive correlate of radiotherapy (RT)-induced neurovascular injury. Methods: Fifty WHO Grade 2/3 glioma patients and 50 matched healthy controls underwent pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) MRI and a standardized cognitive test battery. Regional CBF was compared between patients (n=44, after quality control) and controls (n=50) using ANCOVA with age, sex, and deep white matter CBF as covariates. In irradiated patients (~5 years post-RT), RT dose-CBF associations were assessed using region-wise regression, and regional CBF was compared among controls and low-dose ([&le;]15 Gy) versus high-dose ([&ge;]40 Gy) regional RT exposure groups. Cognition-CBF associations were evaluated in a priori domain-specific regions of interest. Results: Compared with controls, patients showed frontoparietal cortical hypoperfusion, with significantly lower CBF in middle frontal and superior/inferior parietal cortices (all q<0.01; partial -squared=0.128-0.147). Region-wise regression showed no significant linear RT dose-CBF associations after correction. However, subgroup analyses identified RT dose-sensitive regions with [&ge;]40 Gy exposure that showed lower adjusted CBF than controls, most prominently in the left precentral and caudal middle frontal cortices (q<0.01; adjusted-{Delta}CBF{approx}-27.2--28.8 mL/100g/min). Perfusion in the left precentral and postcentral gyri of irradiated patients correlated positively with motor performance. Conclusions: pCASL reveals persistent cortical hypoperfusion in glioma patients that spatially corresponds with RT dose exposure and associates with cognitive performance, positioning ASL as a promising non-invasive biomarker of RT-related neurovascular injury.

Purpose. The radiosensitivity index (RSI) and genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) are increasingly treated as quantitative inputs to radiotherapy dose calculation. Two reproducibility issues bear on this use: whether CT radiomics can non-invasively recover RSI, and whether one coefficient of the equation is uniquely specified (printed CDK1 but implemented as PAK2). We examine both on public data. Methods. In GEO GSE103584 RNA-seq (n = 130 non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]), we recomputed RSI with the Eschrich 2009 coefficients using CDK1 or PAK2 in the disputed slot and derived GARD under four fixed dose/fractionation schemas. In the paired TCIA NSCLC-Radiogenomics cohort (n = 117), we trained cross-validated Elastic Net and Random Forest models to predict continuous RSI and a median-split RSI label from IBSI-conformant, scanner-corrected CT radiomic features, under a pre-set viability rule. Results. CT radiomics did not recover RSI (Spearman rho = 0.05 and 0.03; binary AUC = 0.43), below the pre-set viability threshold. Separately, the two probesets listed for the disputed coefficient in the founding paper's Table 3 both map to PAK2; using the printed CDK1 left rank correlation high (rho = 0.980) but reclassified 6.2% and 9.2% of patients (median and tertile) and shifted GARD by 4.1 to 6.3 Gy. Conclusions. CT radiomics is not a viable RSI surrogate in this public cohort, so imaging-GARD should not assume radiomic recovery of RSI. The disputed coefficient resolves to PAK2; implementing the printed CDK1 shifts GARD and reclassifies patients despite high rank correlation. Outcome-directed, dose-adjusted imaging is the more defensible next step.

Background: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in up to 40% of men following radical prostatectomy (RP). Current risk models rely primarily on clinicopathologic variables and may not fully capture the biological heterogeneity associated with recurrence. The Decipher Genomic Classifier (DGC), prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET), and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) provide complementary prognostic information that may improve prediction. Objective: To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models integrating DGC, PSMA-PET, and mpMRI for preoperative prediction of BCR following RP. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with available preoperative DGC, PSMA-PET, mpMRI, and clinicopathologic data. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and XGBoost models were developed using single- and multimodality feature combinations. Early- and intermediate-fusion strategies were evaluated. Performance was assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis. Results: XGBoost consistently outperformed LR and RF. DGC achieved the highest single-modality performance (AUC 0.94, accuracy 86.7%). Among multimodal models, DGC combined with PSMA-PET using intermediate fusion achieved the best overall performance (AUC 0.93, accuracy 87.0%). Addition of mpMRI reduced performance (AUC 0.85, accuracy 83.0%). Decision curve analysis demonstrated positive net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. Conclusion: XGBoost-based multimodal fusion improved preoperative BCR prediction following RP. DGC was the strongest individual predictor, while integration with PSMA-PET provided the best overall performance, supporting the potential of radiogenomic ML models for personalized risk stratification.

Abstract Purpose: To compare scalar circulating blood dose summaries, assess whether associations with grade 3 or higher lymphopenia and overall survival persisted after planning target volume (PTV) adjustment, and distinguish scalar from exploratory dynamic blood dose analyses. Methods and Materials: The assembled dataset included 133 patients from 2 retrospective thoracic radiation cohorts; 121 entered the dosimetric main analysis and 116 passed a post hoc dosimetric gate. Six scalar exposures were compared: an ICE3 (Immune Circulation radiation Exposure Estimator Engine) 10 compartment mean-dose metric, corrected effective dose to immune cells (EDIC), body remainder dose, a hematological dose (HEDOS) derived organ-mean approximation, mean lung dose, and mean heart dose. Logistic base models included baseline absolute lymphocyte count, concurrent chemotherapy, and cohort; PTV was then added. Overall survival used cohort-stratified Cox models on an endpoint-specific common set. Benjamini Hochberg correction was applied within prespecified 6exposure families and, separately, across 3 selected post hoc bootstrap contrasts. Results: The lymphopenia analysis included 94 patients and 69 events. After PTV adjustment, the HEDOS derived approximation remained nominally associated (odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-5.45; P=.017; q=.102), but no exposure survived false-discovery-rate control. The survival set contained 92 patients and 42 deaths; no PTV adjusted scalar exposure was associated with survival (all q>=.531). In post hoc analyses, the standardized association of mean heart dose with overall survival was more positive than that of ICE3 (difference in log hazard ratios, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.13 0.94; multiplicity-adjusted q=.024). The corresponding contrast with the HEDOS derived approximation did not meet the adjusted significance threshold (q=.053). These coefficient contrasts do not establish superior predictive performance or causality. Exported ICE3 kinetic summaries had no false-discovery-rate-significant residual associations. A 13 case HEDOS bDVH audit showed little change under one continuous versus 10 second gap perturbation. Conclusions: PTV adjustment attenuated scalar blood-dose associations with severe lymphopenia, and no scalar exposure retained a multiplicity-robust survival association. The selected mean heart dose coefficient contrast is hypothesis generating and does not establish superior prediction. The primary cohort comparison evaluated a HEDOS derived organ-mean approximation rather than the full dynamic HEDOS framework; therefore, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence against the potential value of particle level blood dose distributions or time-dependent blood-flow modeling.

Background: MRI is widely used in radiotherapy planning due to its high soft-tissue contrast, but geometric distortions can compromise target localization accuracy. Objective: This study aimed to develop an accessible method for assessing geometric distortion in MRI using two phantoms - a commercial anthropomorphic phantom and a custom-made phantom fabricated from ABS plastic. Approach: CT imaging was used as the reference standard. Distortion was assessed through linear measurements of periodic structures in a DICOM viewer, followed by statistical analysis. Significance: The study evaluates the clinical impact of distortion on radiotherapy planning and proposes a cost-effective solution for routine quality assurance in resource-limited settings.

Background Optic pathway hypothalamic glioma (OPHG) can cause irreversible visual impairment. Radiotherapy and radiosurgery are used for progressive, recurrent, or treatment-refractory disease, but their effects on visual outcomes remain incompletely defined. Objective To synthesize visual outcomes following radiotherapy or radiosurgery for OPHG, with visual preservation as the primary outcome. Methods This prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420261440136) followed the PRISMA 2020 statement. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 1 June 2026. Eligible studies included patients with OPHG or related optic pathway or hypothalamic gliomas treated with radiotherapy or radiosurgery and reporting extractable visual outcomes. Visual preservation was defined as stable or improved vision. Random-effects meta-analyses of logit-transformed proportions were performed. Results Forty-nine studies were included in the systematic review, of which 19 contributed 494 visual outcome observations to the meta-analysis. The pooled visual preservation rate was 75.6% (95% CI 65.1% to 83.7%; I2 = 71.6%). Pooled rates of visual improvement, stability, and worsening were 24.7% (95% CI 19.5% to 30.8%), 46.7% (95% CI 37.0% to 56.6%), and 20.6% (95% CI 12.7% to 31.6%), respectively. Preservation was higher in pure radiotherapy or radiosurgery cohorts than in mixed-treatment cohorts (85% vs 66%; subgroup p = 0.0104), although differences in cohort composition and treatment attribution may have influenced this finding. Conclusion Radiotherapy and radiosurgery were associated with preservation of vision in approximately three-quarters of evaluable outcomes, predominantly through visual stability rather than recovery. Standardized visual outcome definitions are needed to improve future comparisons and treatment evaluation.

Purpose/Objective There is paucity of data reporting outcomes of breast cancers with initial internal mammary nodal involvement and no visceral metastases, treated with curative hypofractionated radiotherapy . We report the outcomes from a tertiary centre alongside spatial patterns of recurrences in the above group Material/Methods For this retrospective cross-sectional study, consecutive patients contoured as per the ESTRO 2013 guidelines, treated between 2016-2022 were eligible if their diagnostic imaging demonstrated involvement of the internal mammary nodes. Radiotherapy (40 Gy/15#/3 weeks) was delivered to the residual breast / thoracic wall, SCF region corresponding to the ESTRO lymph node level 4 and internal mammary chain nodes. Residual IMN/ level 4 nodes received a boost of 10Gy/5#. Spatial mapping of sites of recurrence at the local site and three nodal sites (axilla, SCF and IMN) was performed using deformable image registration. Sites of recurrence at the local site and three nodal levels were contoured separately. Volumetric intersection of the recurrent gross tumour volume (GTV_recurrence) with treated clinical target volume (CTV) was calculated. Actuarial overall (OS), disease free survival (DFS) & cumulative incidence of local (LR), regional (RR) and loco-regional recurrence(LRR) were calculated using Kaplan Meier method. Univariate comparison of outcomes with or without residual disease was performed using the log rank test. Results The median age of the 61 eligible women was 49 years. 77% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the rest adjuvant chemotherapy. 82% patients had a mastectomy. Axillary lymph node dissection was done in 96.7%. Boosts to residual IMN and SCF nodes were delivered to 21(34.4%) and 2 (3.3%) respectively. Median follow up was 3.6 years. Out of the 61 patients, 42 patients were disease free with an estimated 3 year disease free survival of 75% (95% CI 64, 88%). Spatial mapping of locoregional recurrence was possible in all but 1 patient with local (only) recurrence who was lost to follow-up after mammogram only. Among the patients with loco regional recurrence 1 had recurrence in local site + SCF +axilla, 3 had recurrence in the SCF+axilla, 2 in the SCF+IMN and 1 in the axilla+SCF+IMN. Only one patient had isolated axillary recurrence or isolated SCF recurrence. There were no IMN only recurrences. Among the 8 patients with nodal recurrence, a total of 27 individual GTV_recurrence were identified in the axilla(n=11), SCF(n=11) and IMN (n=5). IMN recurrences showed complete or partial overlap with CTV. SCF recurrences were a mix with predominantly in-field recurrences while axillary recurrences occurred outside the treated volume.Four (6.6%) patients had Grade 2 lymphoedema as documented late side effect. Conclusion Aggressive treatment of IMN disease with adjuvant radiation is effective with good locoregional control. Systemic recurrences are common and may benefit from intensification strategies.

Background. Accurate delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) - primary tumour (GTVp) and nodal disease (GTVn) - on FDG-PET/CT is a critical step of head and neck radiotherapy planning. Comparisons between lightweight custom networks and the auto-configured nnU-Net v2 are usually reported as end-to-end pipelines, conflating the contribution of the network with that of the inference-time post-processing applied on top of it. We separated the two. Methods. MiniUNet3D (custom 3D U-Net, 18.3 M parameters) and nnU-Net v2 (3d_fullres, 88.2 M parameters) were trained on the same 578 FDG-PET/CT cases (85/15 author-defined split of the HECKTOR 2025 Task 1 set, 8 centres) and evaluated on the same internal cohort. Three arms were compared pairwise: MiniUNet3D raw output at a fixed 0.5 threshold, MiniUNet3D with a locked adaptive post-processing pipeline, and nnU-Net v2. Comparisons used paired Wilcoxon tests with bootstrap confidence intervals, Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg correction, and Cohen's d; catastrophic failure (Dice < 0.01) was compared with an exact McNemar test. Cases with an empty reference for a given target were excluded from that target's analysis (n = 98 GTVp, n = 93 GTVn). Results. With post-processing matched off, nnU-Net v2 was superior: median GTVp Dice 0.799 versus 0.592 (mean difference -0.244, 95 % CI -0.300 to -0.191; d = -0.88) and GTVn 0.774 versus 0.598 (d = -0.82). Post-processing raised MiniUNet3D to 0.800 (GTVp) and 0.738 (GTVn), recovering 79 % of that difference. Post-processed, MiniUNet3D matched nnU-Net v2 on GTVp Dice (p = 0.113) but remained inferior on nodal disease after Bonferroni correction (Dice p = 0.041; surface Dice p = 0.049). Catastrophic GTVp failures were 25/98 raw, 8/98 post-processed and 1/98 for nnU-Net v2 (McNemar p = 0.016). Inference took 34 s versus 78 s per case on the same GPU. Conclusions. Post-processing recovered most, but not all, of the difference between the two models, and it did not confer robustness: an eight-fold higher rate of empty contours on small primaries persisted, which is the more consequential difference for planning safety. Pipeline comparisons reported without a post-processing ablation risk attributing to a network what post-processing supplied.

Background and purpose. Patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) exhibit heterogeneous courses of radiation-associated dysphagia (RAD) during recovery, yet most survivorship models typically treat RAD uniformly. This study aimed to identify distinct, data-driven RAD longitudinal Phenotypes based on imaging-graded swallow function from pre-treatment to 30 months post-RT and to characterize their baseline predictors. Materials and methods. Heterogeneous linear mixed-effects latent class trajectory modeling was applied to longitudinal DIGEST scores from the Stiefel MDA-OPC prospective registry. Eligible patients had [&ge;]3 Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) assessments between baseline and 30 months post-RT. Models were evaluated across functional forms and 1-5 latent classes; final selection used the Bayesian Information Criterion. Baseline predictors of class membership were identified via binary logistic regression. Results. The cohort comprised 650 OPC patients (2,116 MBS assessments; mean age 61 years, 89% male, 93% HPV-positive). Four RAD Phenotypes were identified: No/Minimal RAD (n=385/650, 59%), Mild/Moderate RAD (n=104/650, 16%), Moderate/Severe Transient RAD (n=94/650, 15%), and Moderate/Severe Progressing RAD (n=67/650, 10%). Classification quality was acceptable (mean posterior probabilities 0.78-0.89; entropy 0.69). Baseline DIGEST impairment, base-of-tongue primary, advanced T stage, and age [&ge;]60 independently predicted membership in higher-burden Phenotypes (AUC=0.845; 10-fold CV-AUC=0.835). Conclusion. RAD following RT for OPC comprises four biologically and clinically distinct longitudinal Phenotypes, predictable from pre-treatment characteristics. These findings support trajectory phenotyping as outcome framework for RAD research and risk-adaptive survivorship care.

Purpose: Clinical assessment of vertebral lesion quality (osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed) remains subjective, with limited interobserver reliability. This study evaluated a novel application of 3D convolutional neural networks (3D-CNNs) for classifying lesion quality from CT volumes in metastatic cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used CT data from 151 cancer patients planned for radiotherapy for metastatic spine disease (September 2020-July 2024). Leveraging vertebra-level expert annotations, we introduced an unconventional U-Net-based strategy converting coarse voxel-wise predictions into vertebra-level lesion classifications. The final dataset comprised 2,125 vertebrae across four classes (no lesion, osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed), split into a 3-fold cross-validation set and an independent holdout test set. Model performance was benchmarked against a DenseNet121 baseline and a musculoskeletal radiologist, with Cohen's kappa assessing inter-rater agreement. Results: The 3D model achieved an ensemble accuracy of 84.7%, outperforming DenseNet121 (72.1%), with substantial gains in F1 score, precision, and balanced accuracy. It showed high concordance with the radiologist (Cohen's kappa = 0.76) and comparable sensitivity and specificity across all lesion subtypes. We found both models and the radiologist to struggle with osteolytic lesions, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing this class from age-related changes in vertebral bone density and architecture caused by benign bone lesions, age-related systemic skeletal disorders and cancer treatments. Conclusions: 3D-CNNs trained with vertebra-level labels can accurately and reliably classify vertebral metastatic lesion quality from CT scans, offering a scalable path toward automated characterization of metastatic spine disease to support clinical decision-making and large-scale radiomics research.

BackgroundRadiotherapy can provide durable local control for optic pathway-hypothalamic glioma (OPHG), but its use is limited by concern regarding delayed vascular, endocrine, visual, oncological, and neurological toxicities. ObjectiveTo systematically characterize and quantify the safety of radiotherapy and radiosurgery for OPHG and explore clinically relevant modifiers of treatment-related toxicity. MethodsPubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through 1 June 2026. Eligible non-randomized studies reporting safety outcomes after radiotherapy or radiosurgery were included. Random-effects binomial-normal generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to pool proportions, with exact conditional models for sparse comparative analyses. ResultsThirty-five studies were included, of which 31 contributed event-level data to at least one quantitative safety outcome. The pooled incidence of any treatment-related toxicity was 8.46% (95% CI, 1.37-38.01%). Vasculopathy occurred in 9.44% (95% CI, 5.22-16.49%). Secondary neoplasms occurred in 5.41% (95% CI, 2.23-12.53%), decreasing to 2.83% under a strict malignant-event definition. Incident endocrinopathy had the highest pooled estimate at 21.19% (95% CI, 4.72-59.31%) and increased with longer follow-up. Treatment-related visual toxicity was 2.26%, whereas radiation-related mortality was 0.59%. Radiation necrosis, severe toxicity, and treatment-attributed neurocognitive toxicity were sparsely reported. ConclusionLate toxicity following radiotherapy for OPHG is heterogeneous, with endocrinopathy, vasculopathy, and secondary neoplasms representing the principal quantifiable safety concerns. Treatment decisions should therefore be individualized, with prolonged vascular, endocrine, visual, and oncological surveillance and further prospective evaluation of contemporary radiation techniques.

Background and purpose: Radiation-induced lymphopenia is associated with adverse outcomes in thoracic malignancies. FLASH radiotherapy delivers radiation over a timescale of hundreds of milliseconds, potentially reducing the fraction of irradiated circulating lymphocytes. In this study, we investigated whether FLASH mitigates lymphopenia after thoracic irradiation delivered with protons or photons. Materials and methods: C57BL/6 mice received three 13.5-Gy whole-heart fractions at 48-hour intervals using FLASH or standard dose-rate proton irradiation at the University of Pennsylvania (n=15), with photon validation at Queen's University Belfast (n=72). Leukocytes and CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, B cells, and NK cells were quantified by hemocytometer and flow cytometry. A continuous-time Markov model simulated lymphocyte trafficking, dose accumulation, and post-irradiation recovery. Results: FLASH attenuated leukocyte depletion across both proton and photon irradiation modalities. In the proton cohort, white blood cell counts were significantly higher after FLASH at D1, D3, D7, and D14; CD4 T cells and NK cells were preserved through D14, while CD8 T cell sparing persisted through D21. Photon FLASH preserved CD45 leukocytes at D1, D3, D7, and D21, with sustained CD8 sparing at D21. Modeling showed that FLASH shifted the lymphocyte dose distribution toward lower exposures, increasing the proportion of lymphocytes receiving <1 Gy from 2.4% to 16.4%, and reduced the proportion of lymphocytes repeatedly irradiated across all three fractions from 36.3% at standard dose rate to 9.18%, despite similar median cumulative doses. The spleen contributed substantially to cumulative lymphocyte dose, and marrow-entering lymphocytes displayed a more high-dose-enriched distribution after FLASH irradiation. Conclusion: FLASH consistently mitigated radiation-induced lymphopenia for proton and photon modalities, with durable CD8 T cell preservation. These findings support a kinetic mechanism and provide a rationale for combining FLASH radiotherapy with immune-sparing planning and immunotherapy.